I rely on podcasts to keep me entertained on long trail runs. Initially it was by necessity as there are only so many hours in a day. If you are going to lace up the sneakers and be off grid during a busy work week--the juice better be worth the squeeze. What started as a diversion for entertainment quickly escalated into an academic exploration into a wide variety of topics.
Candidly, rigorous and reliable sources of information are tainted with profit motives, pay-walls that limit information exchange, bias, and large egos. For these reasons and many others I have relied on the written insights of Peter Attia, MD. I have written about him before, How Should We Discuss Emerging Drugs for Patients with High Cholesterol and read everything he writes.
Peter has a new podcast. It is long, detailed, and perfectly technical for my taste but you may either be overwhelmed or not the sort that can appreciate a long listen--but you should. It is brilliant. The show notes alone will make you better informed. I will share a few highlights here but if you have commute time or schedule meaningful education into your work life--go all in.
I worked with a brilliant cardiologist for several years and was introduced to critical thinking, potential bias in peer review, and from time to time--the limits of statistical analysis in the absence of qualified interpretation. In fact, the name of this blog was pulled from my days working with research fellows required to present their data in a journal club format. I often stated, Come for the Donuts, Stay for the Data as we shared Krispy Kreme donuts outside the lecture hall.
Consider this a warm morsel right from the oven--dig in...
If you are going to dive into only a few of the topics discussed I think your first hop should be over to The early years of lipoprotein research: from discovery to clinical application.
Many recent studies, however, have under-scored the importance of considering the heterogeneity among LDL and HDL particles, e.g., their quality and number, and their variable association with CVD risk.
Research evolving across a wide variety of therapeutic areas continues to point toward metabolic derangement as a major player in chronic disease.
Discussions of Mendelian randomization spurring engagement of genetic variants as tools for examining modifiable exposure in observational studies are intriguing. Particularly relevant when looking to illuminate the role of limiting cholesterol synthesis vs. focusing on receptor integrity.
Think of PCSK9 inhibition and what we know about the blunted exposure of clinical trial efficacy compared to lifetime exposure in individuals with a PCSK9 genetic mutation showing changes in hyper- function or hypo-function (lowering LDL).
You may recall from your high school science that Mendel was a 19th century monk that discovered pathways of genetic inheritance by studying peas. An assumption of randomization provides the ability to study a single genetic variant or collection of variants associated with a biomarker to test causality of a disease process. Differences observed with genetic variants demonstrate that life long exposure predicts CVD risk more robustly than clinical trials because the magnitude of effect during investigational trials is limited in exposure.
I am working my way through the resources listed for this recent podcast. I have always been puzzled about the demarcation of disease by organ system and specialties. It may be the reason that we are unable to decipher meaningful advancements in Alzheimer's disease. Reduced plasma desmosterol-to-cholesterol ratio and longitudinal cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease provides an investigation into an association between plasma desmosterol-to cholesterol (DES/CHO) ratio in patients with Alzheimer's disease and longitudinal cognitive decline. You can see in the graphic from the study; the control (blue), mild cognitive impairment (green), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) (red) findings.
Plasma DES/CHO is reduced in AD patients and correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score.
"The longitudinal analysis revealed that plasma DES/CHO in AD patients shows a significant decrease at follow-up intervals. The decline in plasma DES/CHO is larger in the AD group with rapid progression than in that with slow progression. The changes in plasma DES/CHO significantly correlated with changes in the MMSE score."
These findings seem to support DES/CHO as a potential longitudinal surrogate marker associated with cognitive decline outside of protein deposition in the brain. I will post more over at Alzheimer's disease: The Brand once I read the resources posted by Peter Attia.
I hope you will head over to the podcast for this important episode. Here is the bulleted list from the podcast website.
Browse the archive...
Thank you for making a donution!
In a world of "evidence-based" medicine I am a bigger fan of practice-based evidence.
Remember the quote by Upton Sinclair...
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”
Sign up for our newsletter!